changeset 3551:65dc45982df9 HEAD

Removed fcntl() text from some locking error messages, because if lock_method=flock, it was done using flock().. Also did several s/it's/its/ in comments and one error message.
author Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi>
date Sat, 27 Aug 2005 13:20:39 +0300
parents 6fbdd79b32a5
children 6a1ea27a4256
files src/lib-index/mail-cache-compress.c src/lib-index/mail-cache-decisions.c src/lib-index/mail-cache-lookup.c src/lib-index/mail-index-lock.c src/lib-index/mail-index.c src/lib-index/mail-transaction-log.c
diffstat 6 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) [+]
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/src/lib-index/mail-cache-compress.c	Thu Aug 25 20:18:20 2005 +0300
+++ b/src/lib-index/mail-cache-compress.c	Sat Aug 27 13:20:39 2005 +0300
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@
 	uint32_t i, message_count, seq, first_new_seq, old_offset;
 	uoff_t offset;
 
-	/* get sequence of first message which doesn't need it's temp fields
+	/* get sequence of first message which doesn't need its temp fields
 	   removed. */
 	idx_hdr = mail_index_get_header(view);
 	if (idx_hdr->day_first_uid[7] == 0) {
--- a/src/lib-index/mail-cache-decisions.c	Thu Aug 25 20:18:20 2005 +0300
+++ b/src/lib-index/mail-cache-decisions.c	Sat Aug 27 13:20:39 2005 +0300
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
 
    There are some problems, such as if a client accesses message older than
    a week, we can't know if user just started using a new client which is
-   just filling it's local cache for the first time. Or it might be a
+   just filling its local cache for the first time. Or it might be a
    client user hasn't just used for over a week. In these cases we
    shouldn't have marked the field to be permanently cached. User might
    also switch clients from non-caching to caching.
--- a/src/lib-index/mail-cache-lookup.c	Thu Aug 25 20:18:20 2005 +0300
+++ b/src/lib-index/mail-cache-lookup.c	Sat Aug 27 13:20:39 2005 +0300
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@
 
 		if (file_field >= cache->file_fields_count) {
 			/* new field, have to re-read fields header to figure
-			   out it's size */
+			   out its size */
 			if (mail_cache_header_fields_read(cache) < 0)
 				return -1;
 			if (file_field >= cache->file_fields_count) {
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@
 		next_pos = pos + ((data_size + 3) & ~3);
 		if (data_size > cache_rec->size || next_pos > cache_rec->size) {
 			mail_cache_set_corrupted(cache,
-				"record continues outside it's allocated size");
+				"record continues outside its allocated size");
 			return -1;
 		}
 
--- a/src/lib-index/mail-index-lock.c	Thu Aug 25 20:18:20 2005 +0300
+++ b/src/lib-index/mail-index-lock.c	Sat Aug 27 13:20:39 2005 +0300
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@
 		return -1;
 
 	mail_index_set_error(index, "Timeout while waiting for release of "
-			     "shared fcntl() lock for index file %s",
+			     "shared lock for index file %s",
 			     index->filepath);
 	index->index_lock_timeout = TRUE;
 	return -1;
--- a/src/lib-index/mail-index.c	Thu Aug 25 20:18:20 2005 +0300
+++ b/src/lib-index/mail-index.c	Sat Aug 27 13:20:39 2005 +0300
@@ -1529,7 +1529,7 @@
 	old_fd = index->fd;
 	old_map->refcount++;
 
-	/* new file, new locks. the old fd can keep it's locks, they don't
+	/* new file, new locks. the old fd can keep its locks, they don't
 	   matter anymore as no-one's going to modify the file. */
 	old_lock_type = index->lock_type;
 	old_lock_id = index->lock_id;
--- a/src/lib-index/mail-transaction-log.c	Thu Aug 25 20:18:20 2005 +0300
+++ b/src/lib-index/mail-transaction-log.c	Sat Aug 27 13:20:39 2005 +0300
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@
 
 	mail_index_set_error(file->log->index,
 			     "Timeout while waiting for release of "
-			     "fcntl() lock for transaction log file %s",
+			     "lock for transaction log file %s",
 			     file->filepath);
 	file->log->index->index_lock_timeout = TRUE;
 	return -1;