Mercurial > hg > gitweb
diff comparison.txt @ 58:2ab801e0ea9f
A quick set of comparisons between hg, git, and bk
| author | mpm@selenic.com |
|---|---|
| date | Thu, 12 May 2005 01:20:16 -0800 |
| parents | |
| children | 17e66e1a0382 |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/comparison.txt Thu May 12 01:20:16 2005 -0800 @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ + Mercurial git BK (*) +storage revlog delta compressed revisions SCCS weave +merge file DAGs changeset DAG file DAGs? +consistency SHA1 SHA1 CRC +signable? yes yes no + +retrieve file tip O(1) O(1) O(revs) +add rev O(1) O(1) O(revs) +find prev file rev O(1) O(changesets) O(revs) +annotate file O(1)|O(revs) O(changesets) O(revs) +find file changeset O(1) O(changesets) ? + +checkout O(files) O(files) O(revs)? +commit O(changes) O(changes) ? + 6 patches/s 6 patches/s slow +diff working dir O(changes) O(changes) ? + < 1s < 1s ? +tree diff revs O(changes) O(changes) ? + < 1s < 1s ? +local clone O(files) O(revisions) O(files) +find remote csets O(log new) O(revisions) ? +pull remote csets O(patch) O(modified files) O(patch) + 100 csets/s 8 csets/s ? +repo growth O(patch) O(revisions) O(patch) + kernel history 250M? 3.5G? 250M? +lines of code 2500 6500 (+ cogito) ?? + +* I've never used BK so this is just guesses